Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,611
edits
Changes
→Chip Berlet: full cite
Several official written Wikipedia policies had been rewritten<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Rangerdude/Workshop#Request_of_finding_for_ex_post_facto_policy_changes Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Willmcw and SlimVirgin/Workshop/Request of finding for ex post facto policy changes]</ref><ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ANo_original_research&diff=31675236&oldid=31668491 Wikipedia:No original research], Revision as of 00:21, 17 December 2005; SlimVirgin removes the language, "Wikipedia welcomes experts and academics. However, such experts do not occupy a privileged position within Wikipedia."</ref>and modified at various times to exempt Berlet from provisions and applications. On most occasssions, enforcement of exisitng policies has been simply ignored. [http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=13204&pid=54218&mode=threaded&show=&st=0&#entry54218]
Several official written Wikipedia policies had been rewritten<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Rangerdude/Workshop#Request_of_finding_for_ex_post_facto_policy_changes Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Willmcw and SlimVirgin/Workshop/Request of finding for ex post facto policy changes]</ref><ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ANo_original_research&diff=31675236&oldid=31668491 Wikipedia:No original research], Revision as of 00:21, 17 December 2005; SlimVirgin removes the language, "Wikipedia welcomes experts and academics. However, such experts do not occupy a privileged position within Wikipedia."</ref>and modified at various times to exempt Berlet from provisions and applications. On most occasssions, enforcement of exisitng policies has been simply ignored. [http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=13204&pid=54218&mode=threaded&show=&st=0&#entry54218]
Berlet, a self proclaimed expert on the subject of anti-Semitism, had been unanimously rejected by several key and influencial Wikipedia Adminstrators as a reputable source<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Roots_of_anti-Semitism#What_counts_as_reputable.3F Talk:Roots of anti-Semitism/What counts as reputable?]</ref><ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Roots_of_anti-Semitism&diff=20321342&oldid=20321025], Revision as of 07:17, 5 August 2005,
Berlet, a self proclaimed expert on the subject of anti-Semitism, had been unanimously rejected by several key and influencial Wikipedia Adminstrators as a reputable source<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Roots_of_anti-Semitism#What_counts_as_reputable.3F Talk:Roots of anti-Semitism/What counts as reputable?]</ref><ref>[Talk:Roots of anti-Semitism/Deep problems with the articlehttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Roots_of_anti-Semitism&diff=20321342&oldid=20321025], Revision as of 07:17, 5 August 2005,
Goodoldpolonius2; "the whole article is essentially original research. The only source cited (besides Chip Berlet's chart, which, whatever its merits, has remarkably little to do with the roots of racial anti-Semitism in the 19th century)....The racial anti-Semitism section is not factually correct." [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roots_of_anti-Semitism&diff=prev&oldid=20321341#Racial_anti-Semitism]</ref> for the Wikipedia [[mainspace]] article, "Roots of Anti-Smeitism" in 2005.
Goodoldpolonius2; "the whole article is essentially original research. The only source cited (besides Chip Berlet's chart, which, whatever its merits, has remarkably little to do with the roots of racial anti-Semitism in the 19th century)....The racial anti-Semitism section is not factually correct." [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roots_of_anti-Semitism&diff=prev&oldid=20321341#Racial_anti-Semitism]</ref> for the Wikipedia [[mainspace]] article, "Roots of Anti-Smeitism" in 2005.