:How can an "unbiased" article have sentences such as "The film ignores the evidence that atmospheric temperature is cyclical in nature and has gone up and down hundreds of times in the last million years", or "Al Gore has found a way to profit from global catastrophe"? Have you watched the film? Al Gore does ''not'' ignore the fact of climate cycles. He includes his rebuttal in the film! You can disagree with his conclusions or his data but he does ''not'' ignore the criticisms of global warming.[[User:Archibald|Archibald]] 00:15, 1 October 2007 (EDT) | :How can an "unbiased" article have sentences such as "The film ignores the evidence that atmospheric temperature is cyclical in nature and has gone up and down hundreds of times in the last million years", or "Al Gore has found a way to profit from global catastrophe"? Have you watched the film? Al Gore does ''not'' ignore the fact of climate cycles. He includes his rebuttal in the film! You can disagree with his conclusions or his data but he does ''not'' ignore the criticisms of global warming.[[User:Archibald|Archibald]] 00:15, 1 October 2007 (EDT) |