User:Iduan

I probably will not be editing for a while. I have a lot going on currently that take precedent over my duties at Conservapedia, and in addition to that I'm finding myself too angry to angry to rationally edit. Not angry at Conservapedia (well, to some extent Conservapedia), but actually angry about things on Wikipedia, things I'm reading in the newspaper - and each day I'm fighting the urge to lose my temper on the main page talk. However, all that being said, I have been sick for quite a while - and it is very possible that this anger is stemming from frustration with life in general (STRESS!!!), however regardless I do plan on returning to Conservapedia as soon as possible, and while I can't even begin to set an exact date - I can say that I should be back before two months. That might be tomorrow, it might be in 60 days - but I will come back and hopefully I can continue to work with everyone to produce an encyclopedia. Until then, --IDuan 01:17, 23 October 2007 (EDT)

I am Issac Duan of Arlington, Virginia - a suburb right next to the District of Columbia. The best way to access me is through my talk page. Conservapedia I joined Conservapedia in late April 2007. Edits I have 456 mainspace edits, 101 template edits, 29 Conservapedia edits and a combined 265 talk edits (106 of which went towards template:standardization). Pages I'm really trying to push the mainspace number up now. I hope to be in the 1000 range in a couple months. A few of the many articles I've really worked on are Cuba, Marquis de Lafayette, Waves, O.J. Simpson and 2003 NFL Draft (the latter three I created). Beyond that I like to spread my edits around - and I also vary it. Sometimes I'll be watching the recent changes and I'll do drastic clean up to a low quality article I see, a lot of other times I'll be clicking "Random page" - and fixing up simple aspects like spelling or wikilinks. Templates I have created a few templates, Citations missing, Template doc inline, Template doc, Plainlink, Cite web, and Cite news. I also reworded the long, much-hated Template:Stub and then created with TK a larger redesign towards the goal of standardization. Most of those templates were relatively minor, but the one I'd like to talk about it Citations missing. The goal of that template was to provide a more clean/elegant version of the uncited templates, which in my opinion were over the top. Key differences are viewable through the color scheme - as citations missing keeps the background color of articles, and is separated merely by a border. Also, as far as technical aspects go, Citations missing has a few more links, some of which depend on what page it's put on. Goals My current goal is to garner enough edits to become an admin at conservapedia. I'm one of those few people that enjoy going through categories, and the ability to delete is practically crucial for some of them. One of my activities used to be to go through the deletion category and try and clean up the pages as much as possible (depending on the page - if the page was of low quality I would try to clean it up, if it was of no quality then I wouldn't bother), and it just seemed like a waste to go through all of those and just ignore the ones I knew should be deleted. I'll probably restart that activity soon though, but currently everything is very hectic in my life, so likely not in the immediate future. References

Userboxes Iduan This user fondly remembers President Ronald Reagan. This user believes that the Big Bang occurred, but that God caused it. This user thinks that evolution explains the origin of species. This user believes that firearms should be regulated, per the third word of the Second Amendment. Template:User Gunlawdarfur This user believes it is patriotic to question authority This user does not care about your religious beliefs, so long as they aren't forced on them. This user believes the qur'an, the bible, the Vedas and any other religious text are equally sacred, and each deserves respect. Template:User nodino This user likes Macs. This user supports Aschlafly as the rightful leader of Conservapedia. trust: "reliance on the integrity, strength, ability, surety, etc., of a person or thing; confidence." As of now, I trust you - if you vandalize a page, then you'll see the consequence of breaking trust.