Difference between revisions of "User talk:CWilson"
(→[[Divorce]]: Response) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Also, neutrality does not mean stating inane, insupportable opinions.--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 14:42, 13 March 2007 (EDT) | Also, neutrality does not mean stating inane, insupportable opinions.--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 14:42, 13 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Magellan sailed around the world. What has supposedly changed since then?? --[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 14:44, 13 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:44, March 13, 2007
Incest
The incest article is up for deletion. Surely a fellow quoter of the Bible is as mad as I am!--Meekrok 14:19, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
Divorce
Please stop. The encyclopedia is supposed to have an NPOV, and not to condem people to hell. It's not a blog. In addition, you must understand that, for Christians, the influence Mosaic law has been removed to some extent. I don't have a quote at hand, but it's there. Geekman314(contact me) 14:39, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
- Conservapedia is not a place to present Biblical data as undeniable fact, as much as I might agree with much of it. That's what personal websites are for. Geekman314(contact me) 14:44, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
Earth
Your uncle is not a dependable primary source, but I'm sure he's a fine individual. If you want to back up your viewpoints, they're different enough that they deserve a real citation.--AmesG 14:38, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
Also, neutrality does not mean stating inane, insupportable opinions.--AmesG 14:42, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
Magellan sailed around the world. What has supposedly changed since then?? --Dave3172 14:44, 13 March 2007 (EDT)