Difference between revisions of "Talk:Electricity"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I'm doing this off the cuff, without references. When I'm through describing conductors, semiconductors, and insulators, I'll go back and revise my work with references. [[User:Navy Nuke|Navy Nuke]] 15:51, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
 
I'm doing this off the cuff, without references. When I'm through describing conductors, semiconductors, and insulators, I'll go back and revise my work with references. [[User:Navy Nuke|Navy Nuke]] 15:51, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
The section about atoms probably needs to be moved to a different section.  Also a good detailed description of alternating current and direct current would be good.  This would be a better way to describe electrical circuits(in terms of impedance, resistance, voltage, current, reactance, admittance).

Latest revision as of 22:53, October 26, 2007

I'm doing this off the cuff, without references. When I'm through describing conductors, semiconductors, and insulators, I'll go back and revise my work with references. Navy Nuke 15:51, 15 March 2007 (EDT)

The section about atoms probably needs to be moved to a different section. Also a good detailed description of alternating current and direct current would be good. This would be a better way to describe electrical circuits(in terms of impedance, resistance, voltage, current, reactance, admittance).