The scandal was originally billed as a "hoax", then "controversy" and finally downgraded to "incident". The crisis prompted calls for "reform," so anonymous page creation was discontinued. But anonymous page creation had absolutely nothing to do with the fundamental underlying lack of accountability. This dissimulation of policy was abandoned less than two years later as Wikipedia's usage and ratings slumped in the wake of yet more high profile scandals and questions about Wikipedia core content policies. [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/084292.html] | The scandal was originally billed as a "hoax", then "controversy" and finally downgraded to "incident". The crisis prompted calls for "reform," so anonymous page creation was discontinued. But anonymous page creation had absolutely nothing to do with the fundamental underlying lack of accountability. This dissimulation of policy was abandoned less than two years later as Wikipedia's usage and ratings slumped in the wake of yet more high profile scandals and questions about Wikipedia core content policies. [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/084292.html] |