Difference between revisions of "Talk:Liberal"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Feebasfactor (Talk); changed back to last version by RobSmith)
m (Reverted edits by TK (Talk); changed back to last version by Feebasfactor)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
That's a bit of a stretch, don't you think?
 
That's a bit of a stretch, don't you think?
 
:Why?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 17:35, 5 November 2007 (EST)
 
:Why?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 17:35, 5 November 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
::It's because [[Fred Phelps]] is a [[liberal|liberal activist]] (see the discussion on the [[Talk:Fred Phelps|talk page]] for an explanation).
 +
 +
::By the way, it appears the link is broken anyway. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 18:34, 5 November 2007 (EST)
  
 
== Different definitions of Liberal ==
 
== Different definitions of Liberal ==

Revision as of 02:16, November 6, 2007

! Due to the controversial nature of this article, it has been locked by the Administrators to prevent edit wars or vandalism.
Sysops, please do not unlock it without first consulting the protecting sysop.
Conservlogo.png


Archive 1|Archive 2 |Archive 3

Westboro Baptist Church?

That's a bit of a stretch, don't you think?

Why? Rob Smith 17:35, 5 November 2007 (EST)
It's because Fred Phelps is a liberal activist (see the discussion on the talk page for an explanation).
By the way, it appears the link is broken anyway. Feebasfactor 18:34, 5 November 2007 (EST)

Different definitions of Liberal

Just wanted to add a line pointing out that in some countries such as Australia, the term Liberal is actually used to refer to the conservative view. See the Liberal Party of Australia as an example. This could be worth pointing out as it will prevent them being tarnished by the comments here aimed towards the left wing type Liberals.

That list of (supposed) liberal positions at the beginning is at best a half-truth. Many liberals (including me) DO NOT SUPPORT a number of them.Alloco1 10:43, 21 October 2007 (EDT)

I'm sorry, but the plural of "antidote" is "antidotes," not "data." The list stays. J2xl 22:00, 30 October 2007 (EDT)

And just what is so wrong about taxpayer-supported government schools? If it weren't for them, many people, including my parents, wouldn't have been able to get an education. By the way, does the stance of Aschlafly et al against this mean that they would be willing to voluntarily support the education of children not their own whose parents couldn't afford to?Alloco1 00:38, 24 October 2007 (EDT)