Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
42 bytes removed ,  15:05, November 9, 2007
m
Line 389: Line 389:  
:Do you have evidence that congress was determined to force Bush to break the promise, or was this an example of 'shifting policies to deal with new fiscal realities' if I may quote? [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 07:35, 9 November 2007 (EST)
 
:Do you have evidence that congress was determined to force Bush to break the promise, or was this an example of 'shifting policies to deal with new fiscal realities' if I may quote? [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 07:35, 9 November 2007 (EST)
   −
== Haeckel fraud exposed to the general public by Behe in NYT in 2000 and by Jonathan Wells in 2000 ==
+
== Haeckel fraud exposed by Behe &Jonathan Wells in 2000 ==
    
It appears it is likely that the Haeckel fraud was exposed to the general public by the New York Times in 2000 vis a vis Michael Behe. It also appears as if Stephen Jay Gould was not happy Gould did this.  However, I do know also that [[Jonathan Wells]] also exposed the fraud to the public with his publication of the book Icons of Evolution in 2000.  Please see: http://www.discovery.org/articleFiles/PDFs/survivalOfTheFakest.pdf  It appears though the scientists knew it earlier:
 
It appears it is likely that the Haeckel fraud was exposed to the general public by the New York Times in 2000 vis a vis Michael Behe. It also appears as if Stephen Jay Gould was not happy Gould did this.  However, I do know also that [[Jonathan Wells]] also exposed the fraud to the public with his publication of the book Icons of Evolution in 2000.  Please see: http://www.discovery.org/articleFiles/PDFs/survivalOfTheFakest.pdf  It appears though the scientists knew it earlier:
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487

edits

Navigation menu