| Line 13: |
Line 13: |
| | The [[President of the United States of America|president]] always, however, has enormous [[politics|political]] influence. He is the leader of his own political [[party]], which nominates him. Everything he does affects the positions and fortunes of his [[party]]. If his [[party]] is in control of [[Congress]], then he exerts enormous influence over [[Congress]]. If the opposing political [[party]] controls [[Congress]], then it devotes its time to opposing his policies as much as possible. Either way, the [[President of the United States of America|president]] controls the [[political agenda]]. | | The [[President of the United States of America|president]] always, however, has enormous [[politics|political]] influence. He is the leader of his own political [[party]], which nominates him. Everything he does affects the positions and fortunes of his [[party]]. If his [[party]] is in control of [[Congress]], then he exerts enormous influence over [[Congress]]. If the opposing political [[party]] controls [[Congress]], then it devotes its time to opposing his policies as much as possible. Either way, the [[President of the United States of America|president]] controls the [[political agenda]]. |
| | | | |
| − | Beyond [[politics]], [[historian]]s debate how much influence a [[President of the United States of America|president]] really has over the [[Unites States of America|country]]. But the [[President of the United States of America|president]] is held responsible regardless of whether he is at fault. When [[Iran]]ian students captured the U.S. Embassy in 1979 and held [[America]]n diplomats hostage for a [[year]], [[President of the United States of America|President]] [[Jimmy Carter]] was held responsible. Was it his fault? [[vote]]rs are going to hold him accountable whether he was at fault or not. | + | Beyond [[politics]], [[historian]]s debate how much influence a [[President of the United States of America|president]] really has over the [[United States of America|country]]. But the [[President of the United States of America|president]] is held responsible regardless of whether he is at fault. When [[Iran]]ian students captured the U.S. Embassy in 1979 and held [[America]]n diplomats hostage for a [[year]], [[President of the United States of America|President]] [[Jimmy Carter]] was held responsible. Was it his fault? [[vote]]rs are going to hold him accountable whether he was at fault or not. |
| | | | |
| | [[Economist]]s say that the outcome of every [[president]]ial [[election]] can be predicted by how well the [[economy]] is doing on [[Election]] Day. Can the [[President of the United States of America|president]] control the [[economy]]? Not completely, but he can have an influence. [[Vote]]rs will reelect him if the [[economy]] is doing well, and elect someone else if it is doing poorly. | | [[Economist]]s say that the outcome of every [[president]]ial [[election]] can be predicted by how well the [[economy]] is doing on [[Election]] Day. Can the [[President of the United States of America|president]] control the [[economy]]? Not completely, but he can have an influence. [[Vote]]rs will reelect him if the [[economy]] is doing well, and elect someone else if it is doing poorly. |
| Line 21: |
Line 21: |
| | The [[President of the United States of America|president]] is also commander-in-chief of the [[military]]. He controls its operations, and supervises its conflicts with foreign [[military|militaries]]. After [[Congress]] declares [[war]] (and often when it does not), the [[President of the United States of America|president]] assumes the day-to-day responsibility for conducting that [[war]]. [[President of the United States of America|President]] [[Lyndon Johnson]] would personally review and make decisions about daily [[bomb]]ing runs in [[Vietnam]]. [[President of the United States of America|President]] [[Lincoln]] was hiring, firing, and ordering [[general]]s during the [[Civil War]]. | | The [[President of the United States of America|president]] is also commander-in-chief of the [[military]]. He controls its operations, and supervises its conflicts with foreign [[military|militaries]]. After [[Congress]] declares [[war]] (and often when it does not), the [[President of the United States of America|president]] assumes the day-to-day responsibility for conducting that [[war]]. [[President of the United States of America|President]] [[Lyndon Johnson]] would personally review and make decisions about daily [[bomb]]ing runs in [[Vietnam]]. [[President of the United States of America|President]] [[Lincoln]] was hiring, firing, and ordering [[general]]s during the [[Civil War]]. |
| | | | |
| − | More generally, the [[President of the United States of America|president]] is responsible for all foreign policy. He appoints the [[ambassador]]s, and decides what [[treaty|treaties]] to negotiate and sign. But 2/3rd approval by the [[United States Senate|Senate]] is required for any [[treaty]] to become [[law]]. The [[North Atlantic Free Trade Agreement]] (NAFTA) established so-called “[[free trade]]” between the [[United States]] and [[Mexico]] and [[Canada]]. [[President of the United States of America|President]] [[Bill Clinton|Clinton]] bypassed the requirement of [[United States Senate|Senate]] approval by arranging for [[Congress]] to pass the [[treaty]] directly into [[federal]] [[law]]. Why do you think he did that? (Answer: it only requires a [[majority]] to pass a [[law]] rather than 2/3 in the [[United States Senate|Senate]] to ratify a [[treaty]]). | + | More generally, the [[President of the United States of America|president]] is responsible for all foreign policy. He appoints the [[ambassador]]s, and decides what [[treaty|treaties]] to negotiate and sign. But 2/3rd approval by the [[United States Senate|Senate]] is required for any [[treaty]] to become [[law]]. The [[NAFTA|North Atlantic Free Trade Agreement]] ([[NAFTA]]) established so-called “[[free trade]]” between the [[United States]] and [[Mexico]] and [[Canada]]. [[President of the United States of America|President]] [[Bill Clinton|Clinton]] bypassed the requirement of [[United States Senate|Senate]] approval by arranging for [[Congress]] to pass the [[treaty]] directly into [[federal]] [[law]]. Why do you think he did that? (Answer: it only requires a [[majority]] to pass a [[law]] rather than 2/3 in the [[United States Senate|Senate]] to ratify a [[treaty]]). |
| | | | |
| | The [[President of the United States of America|president]] also has [[legislative]] [[authority]] in signing or [[veto]]ing new [[law]]s. If the [[President of the United States of America|president’s]] [[political party]] is in control of [[Congress]], then he has implicit control over its agenda too. The [[President of the United States of America|president]] typically submits a [[budget]] each year for [[Congress]] to pass in order to pay for the operations of the [[government]] and all its programs. Typically [[Congress]] will add spending to that [[budget]] and include it in one massive [[bill]] for the [[President of the United States of America|president]] to sign. An attempt to give the [[President of the United States of America|president]] “[[line-item veto]]” authority to strike out certain spending items was held to be [[unconstitutional]] for violating [[separation of powers]]. | | The [[President of the United States of America|president]] also has [[legislative]] [[authority]] in signing or [[veto]]ing new [[law]]s. If the [[President of the United States of America|president’s]] [[political party]] is in control of [[Congress]], then he has implicit control over its agenda too. The [[President of the United States of America|president]] typically submits a [[budget]] each year for [[Congress]] to pass in order to pay for the operations of the [[government]] and all its programs. Typically [[Congress]] will add spending to that [[budget]] and include it in one massive [[bill]] for the [[President of the United States of America|president]] to sign. An attempt to give the [[President of the United States of America|president]] “[[line-item veto]]” authority to strike out certain spending items was held to be [[unconstitutional]] for violating [[separation of powers]]. |