1,019
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + − Tsumetai-- I think JC's contribution was helpful. Some scientists might not recognize a concept called "biblical proof", but that's the whole point, really. The mathematical and scientific and religious meanings of "proof" are NOT THE SAME. Maybe that's why creationists get so confused about the theory of evolution. They are accustomed to religious proof (believing certain things are facts, based on faith), and they don't understand that science ''never'' tries to "prove" "facts". So I am going to revert to include JC's part on biblical proof.+
no edit summary
Tsumetai-- I think JC's contribution was helpful. Some scientists might not recognize a concept called "biblical proof", but that's the whole point, really. The mathematical and scientific and religious meanings of "proof" are NOT THE SAME. Maybe that's why creationists get so confused about the theory of evolution. They are accustomed to religious proof (believing certain things are facts, based on faith), and they don't understand that science ''never'' tries to "prove" "facts". So I am going to revert to include JC's part on biblical proof.
:I'm not against a section on biblical proof per se. Just not that one. The definition of 'God' is already in the [[God]] article, and as for the statement that proof of all things can be found in the Bible...well, I invite anyone who believes that to provide a proof (or disproof) of, say, Goldbach's Conjecture. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 06:23, 14 March 2007 (EDT)