Difference between revisions of "Talk:Infinity"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
::It wasn't that bad. Infinity is not a number, but it ''is'' greater than any real number. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 14:52, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
 
::It wasn't that bad. Infinity is not a number, but it ''is'' greater than any real number. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 14:52, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
XD [[User:Pie5|Pie5]] 21:04, 4 December 2007 (EST)

Revision as of 02:04, December 5, 2007

This article refers to infinity as both being a number, and not being a number. Clarify. RDre 14:12, 11 April 2007 (EDT)

Can you fix it? --Ed Poor 14:13, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
I'm not qualified to judge which it is, but it's been dealt with now. RDre 14:19, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
Good start, but ...
  • In the early 1600's Galileo began to show signs of a modern attitude toward the infinite, when he proposed that "infinity should obey a different arithmetic than finite numbers." But it was not until the late 19th century that Georg Cantor (1845-1918), a German mathematician, finally put infinity on a firm logical foundation and described a way to do arithmetic with infinite quantities useful to mathematics. [1]
We better start over. --Ed Poor 14:50, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
It wasn't that bad. Infinity is not a number, but it is greater than any real number. Tsumetai 14:52, 11 April 2007 (EDT)

XD Pie5 21:04, 4 December 2007 (EST)