Difference between revisions of "User talk:Darkequestrian"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Responding)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Tesseract==
 
==Tesseract==
 
I did not mean to upset you, which is why I went to the Talk page, not the main page.  "the tesseract is a cube suspended in another cube with all the vertices or corners" is not an accurate description of a tessertact.  None of the 6 cubes which make up the tesseract are suspended within any of the others, that is simply how it is modeled in a 3 dimensional space.  I thought that, in describing a mathematical concept, accuracy would be a good thing.  Thanks for your prayers, BTW.  I cannot help but wonder if you would have responded differently if I called myself a Christian. [[User:Boomcoach|Boomcoach]] 14:19, 6 December 2007 (EST)
 
I did not mean to upset you, which is why I went to the Talk page, not the main page.  "the tesseract is a cube suspended in another cube with all the vertices or corners" is not an accurate description of a tessertact.  None of the 6 cubes which make up the tesseract are suspended within any of the others, that is simply how it is modeled in a 3 dimensional space.  I thought that, in describing a mathematical concept, accuracy would be a good thing.  Thanks for your prayers, BTW.  I cannot help but wonder if you would have responded differently if I called myself a Christian. [[User:Boomcoach|Boomcoach]] 14:19, 6 December 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
No, but this is what the tesseract appears to be in our 3rd demension and just so you know that was a typo I just edited it.

Revision as of 19:22, December 6, 2007

Tesseract

I did not mean to upset you, which is why I went to the Talk page, not the main page. "the tesseract is a cube suspended in another cube with all the vertices or corners" is not an accurate description of a tessertact. None of the 6 cubes which make up the tesseract are suspended within any of the others, that is simply how it is modeled in a 3 dimensional space. I thought that, in describing a mathematical concept, accuracy would be a good thing. Thanks for your prayers, BTW. I cannot help but wonder if you would have responded differently if I called myself a Christian. Boomcoach 14:19, 6 December 2007 (EST)

No, but this is what the tesseract appears to be in our 3rd demension and just so you know that was a typo I just edited it.