Changes

Organization
Line 588: Line 588:     
: You're right that it is a cesspit, and our adherence to higher standards than [[Wikipedia]] requires us to refrain from wading into every cesspit.  For now, we'll pass on trying to clean up the cesspit you've identified, though I do not fault you for identifying it as such.  I look forward to reviewing your substantive contributions here.  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:56, 29 December 2007 (EST)
 
: You're right that it is a cesspit, and our adherence to higher standards than [[Wikipedia]] requires us to refrain from wading into every cesspit.  For now, we'll pass on trying to clean up the cesspit you've identified, though I do not fault you for identifying it as such.  I look forward to reviewing your substantive contributions here.  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:56, 29 December 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
== Organization ==
 +
 +
This is a long and impressive list!  I think it might benefit from organizing the points under headings like: "Anti-American Bias", "Anti-Christian Bias", "Anti-Conservative Bias", and so on.  This could make it easier to navigate and more powerful.
 +
 +
If people are interesting in this the categries and which point goes where could be worked on the talk page and then a Sysop could unprotect the page briefly so points could be placed.--[[User:PhineasBogg|PhineasBogg]] 22:02, 29 December 2007 (EST)
71

edits