Difference between revisions of "Talk:France"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Iraq)
(Spelling)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
:It is very important to know who is "with us" and who is "against us".</sarcasm> (Seriously: I technically agree, but I'd leave it in so that a politics section can grow around it.) --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 16:33, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:It is very important to know who is "with us" and who is "against us".</sarcasm> (Seriously: I technically agree, but I'd leave it in so that a politics section can grow around it.) --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 16:33, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Spelling ==
 +
 +
I made a bunch of fixes to the non-American spellings in this article.  Let's keep those double-L's (rivalled) and silent U's (behaviour) out of Conservapedia as per the Commandments.

Revision as of 22:55, March 14, 2007

Unless you go into a full discussion of France's politics, which could very well happen in the future, I suppose, the statement about France not supporting the invasion of Iraq seems to be a bit irrelevant. Are we going to list every single country's stance on the Iraq war? -Commodore Guff 14:52, 8 March 2007 (EST)

It is very important to know who is "with us" and who is "against us".</sarcasm> (Seriously: I technically agree, but I'd leave it in so that a politics section can grow around it.) --Sid 3050 16:33, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

Spelling

I made a bunch of fixes to the non-American spellings in this article. Let's keep those double-L's (rivalled) and silent U's (behaviour) out of Conservapedia as per the Commandments.