Difference between revisions of "Weapons of mass destruction"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Republican (talk | contribs) |
m (God caused the flood before the birth of Sampson) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Weapons of Mass Destruction are weapons designed to kill a large number of people. | Weapons of Mass Destruction are weapons designed to kill a large number of people. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Overall it is important to remember that Weapons of Mass Destruction if held by appropriate forces such as [[NATO]] can be beneficial to the balance of world order. Whereas with a rogue dictator such as the late [[Saddam Hussein] it would be inappropriate to create and stockpile nuclear weapons, a more stable state that does not threaten international order should be able retain the control of Weapons of Mass Destruction peacefully. | Overall it is important to remember that Weapons of Mass Destruction if held by appropriate forces such as [[NATO]] can be beneficial to the balance of world order. Whereas with a rogue dictator such as the late [[Saddam Hussein] it would be inappropriate to create and stockpile nuclear weapons, a more stable state that does not threaten international order should be able retain the control of Weapons of Mass Destruction peacefully. | ||
Revision as of 03:54, March 15, 2007
Weapons of Mass Destruction are weapons designed to kill a large number of people.
Overall it is important to remember that Weapons of Mass Destruction if held by appropriate forces such as NATO can be beneficial to the balance of world order. Whereas with a rogue dictator such as the late [[Saddam Hussein] it would be inappropriate to create and stockpile nuclear weapons, a more stable state that does not threaten international order should be able retain the control of Weapons of Mass Destruction peacefully.