Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 5:
Line 5: − +
no edit summary
ID opponents typically insist that natural processes alone are sufficient to account for biological evolution, but the [[irreducible complexity]] of cellular structures such as the [[flagellum]] are too intricate to have come about through the agency of random natural causes. Indeed, [[natural selection]] itself would nip any changes in the bud before they could accumulate to create anything so complex as a "[[molecular machine]]".
ID opponents typically insist that natural processes alone are sufficient to account for biological evolution, but the [[irreducible complexity]] of cellular structures such as the [[flagellum]] are too intricate to have come about through the agency of random natural causes. Indeed, [[natural selection]] itself would nip any changes in the bud before they could accumulate to create anything so complex as a "[[molecular machine]]".
Departing from their self-imposed realm of [[physical science]], some evolutionists have raised theological objections to intelligent design. One of the most common arguments is an atheistic one; that if an [[Intelligent Designer]] created life in all its forms, he (or it) would also have to have a creator, leading to an [[infinite regress]]. (See [[Arguments for atheism]].)
Departing from their self-imposed realm of [[physical science]], some evolutionists have raised theological objections to intelligent design. One of the most common arguments is an atheistic one; that if an [[Intelligent Designer]] created life in all its forms, such a designer would also have to have a creator, leading to an [[infinite regress]]. (See [[Arguments for atheism]].)
Design theory leaves the identity of the Intelligent Designer open; it seeks instead to develop a reliable methodology for characterizing when a material/energy configuration is best explained by reference to more than strictly unguided natural processes, the identity of the designer being left to follow-on forensic investigative initiatives.
Design theory leaves the identity of the Intelligent Designer open; it seeks instead to develop a reliable methodology for characterizing when a material/energy configuration is best explained by reference to more than strictly unguided natural processes, the identity of the designer being left to follow-on forensic investigative initiatives.