9
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: − +
Debate:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools (view source)
Revision as of 20:55, February 19, 2008
, 20:55, February 19, 2008no edit summary
== No, but it should be taught as a religious alternative to evolution ==
== No, but it should be taught as a religious alternative to evolution ==
No, a thousand times no. Science has a place in school, religion only has a place in church/the home. This is not science. Chris
[[category:conservapedia Debates]]
[[category:conservapedia Debates]]