Difference between revisions of "Talk:First Amendment"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(distinguish between opinion and fact) |
m |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Try to distinguish between opinion and fact. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:04, 31 August 2007 (EDT) | Try to distinguish between opinion and fact. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:04, 31 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Establishment Clause argument== | ||
| + | I really believe that any comments about the [[establishment clause]] belong on the aforementioned page. A link to it on this page would be justifiable, but a random interjection of ones opinion on a certain clause in the middle of a page about an amendment seems unnecessary at best. ~ [[User:Khan|Khan]] 23:00, 24 February 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 04:00, February 25, 2008
ILJM, this comment belongs out of the article:
- The liberal agenda to muzzle religious groups and promote tolerance of deviant lifestyles is one of the gravest threats to our nation.
Try to distinguish between opinion and fact. --Ed Poor Talk 13:04, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
Establishment Clause argument
I really believe that any comments about the establishment clause belong on the aforementioned page. A link to it on this page would be justifiable, but a random interjection of ones opinion on a certain clause in the middle of a page about an amendment seems unnecessary at best. ~ Khan 23:00, 24 February 2008 (EST)