Changes

417 bytes added ,  13:06, March 4, 2008
Line 50: Line 50:     
:: Well put, Philip.  MetcalfeM, it's called censorship when something is permitted to be said only at home, or only in special place.  Liberal concepts like evolution are not censored in the classroom.  Why is prayer censored there?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:46, 3 March 2008 (EST)
 
:: Well put, Philip.  MetcalfeM, it's called censorship when something is permitted to be said only at home, or only in special place.  Liberal concepts like evolution are not censored in the classroom.  Why is prayer censored there?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:46, 3 March 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
::: In America, I can legally go into a bar and flirt with the females without any problem.  But if I were a teacher, and I did that to one of the students, I would be (correctly) disciplined and/or fired for that behavior.  Is that censorship, Aschlafly?  According to your definition it is.  Do you support the right of teachers to flirt with their students? --[[User:Jdellaro|Jdellaro]] 08:06, 4 March 2008 (EST)
    
That I understand. While I wouldnt agree with a teacher leading a prayer in class for the whole class regardless of belief or parents wishes I would certainly agree that it is not right for a blanket ban to be imposed. I mean, I am not religious however if I was part of a school sports team and some of my team members wished to have a prayer circle, while I may not join them, I wouldn't care. Each to there own I say.
 
That I understand. While I wouldnt agree with a teacher leading a prayer in class for the whole class regardless of belief or parents wishes I would certainly agree that it is not right for a blanket ban to be imposed. I mean, I am not religious however if I was part of a school sports team and some of my team members wished to have a prayer circle, while I may not join them, I wouldn't care. Each to there own I say.
376

edits