Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bush v. Gore"
From Conservapedia
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Oh boy, my first revert! (See history) Just out of curiousity, what was the reason?--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 19:38, 9 March 2008 (EDT) | Oh boy, my first revert! (See history) Just out of curiousity, what was the reason?--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 19:38, 9 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Oh. (see updated history) OK, never mind. I clarified the link a little, so people will know what they're getting into.--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 00:44, 10 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 04:44, March 10, 2008
It's not "intervening" in the sense of "sticking your nose in, where it does not belong". The job of the Supreme Court is to handle stuff like this. --Ed Poor Talk 07:20, 21 September 2007 (EDT)
- Some people didn't think that the courts should stick their noses in. Your edit restricts "many people" to just Democrats. Read the next 2 sentences. RSchlafly 12:07, 21 September 2007 (EDT)
Oh boy, my first revert! (See history) Just out of curiousity, what was the reason?--Frey 19:38, 9 March 2008 (EDT)
- Oh. (see updated history) OK, never mind. I clarified the link a little, so people will know what they're getting into.--Frey 00:44, 10 March 2008 (EDT)
