Difference between revisions of "Talk:Marriage"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Message for John.)
(Message for John.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
As far as I know, when they say "civil marriage," they mean the legal thing that may or may not be between a heterosexual couple (depending on where you live). It's a statement of fact, not opinion. Correct me if I'm wrong. --[[User:John|John]] 00:12, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
 
As far as I know, when they say "civil marriage," they mean the legal thing that may or may not be between a heterosexual couple (depending on where you live). It's a statement of fact, not opinion. Correct me if I'm wrong. --[[User:John|John]] 00:12, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
  
This is Conservapedia, where facts rule.  John, if you want to throw in deeply false ideas (like the idea that a civil marriage can be between more than two people), they might like you in Wikipedia. In most states, civil unions are exclusively for a man and a woman! [[User:CEinhorn|CEinhorn]] 01:22, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
+
This is Conservapedia, where facts rule.  John, if you want to throw in deeply false ideas (like the idea that a civil marriage can be between more than two people), they might like you in Wikipedia. In most states, civil unions are exclusively for a man and a woman! [[User:CEinhorn|CEinhorn]] 01:23, 16 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 05:23, March 16, 2007

As far as I know, when they say "civil marriage," they mean the legal thing that may or may not be between a heterosexual couple (depending on where you live). It's a statement of fact, not opinion. Correct me if I'm wrong. --John 00:12, 16 March 2007 (EDT)

This is Conservapedia, where facts rule. John, if you want to throw in deeply false ideas (like the idea that a civil marriage can be between more than two people), they might like you in Wikipedia. In most states, civil unions are exclusively for a man and a woman! CEinhorn 01:23, 16 March 2007 (EDT)