Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
42 bytes added ,  21:25, April 1, 2008
→‎Free Speech Issues: double unsigned
Line 636: Line 636:  
http://www.aclu.org/freespeech/protest/26265prs20060721.html  (ACLU press release)
 
http://www.aclu.org/freespeech/protest/26265prs20060721.html  (ACLU press release)
   −
Therefore I believe this portion of the article should be taken down so Conservapedia can remain as accurate as possible.
+
Therefore I believe this portion of the article should be taken down so Conservapedia can remain as accurate as possible. {{unsigned|Adg2011}}
    
:So, one example out of thousands of contrary ones, makes a logical argument?  --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font></sup> 21:47, 31 March 2008 (EDT)
 
:So, one example out of thousands of contrary ones, makes a logical argument?  --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font></sup> 21:47, 31 March 2008 (EDT)
Line 651: Line 651:     
http://acapella.harmony-central.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1769031#post24424698
 
http://acapella.harmony-central.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1769031#post24424698
I have found many more reasons why I believe this piece of the article should be taked down. This contradicts the statement "virtually never" as stated in the article. Therefore, unless I have missed something, I will take down that segment of the article.
+
I have found many more reasons why I believe this piece of the article should be taked down. This contradicts the statement "virtually never" as stated in the article. Therefore, unless I have missed something, I will take down that segment of the article. {{unsigned|Adg2011}}
5,580

edits

Navigation menu