Difference between revisions of "Talk:Scottish Parliament"
From Conservapedia
m (Yes :-)) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Is this better? [[User:Ferret|-- Ferret]] [[User talk:Ferret|<sub>Nice old chat</sub>]] 22:20, 4 April 2008 (EDT) | :Is this better? [[User:Ferret|-- Ferret]] [[User talk:Ferret|<sub>Nice old chat</sub>]] 22:20, 4 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yes. :-) I am just so new here... --[[User:Vaganyik|Vaganyik]] 10:56, 6 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:56, April 6, 2008
The "Devolution was developed in such a way that..." sentence is not all right because it could not have been developed in any other way. It is the essence of devolution. Would you change it? --Vaganyik 20:09, 3 April 2008 (EDT)
- Is this better? -- Ferret Nice old chat 22:20, 4 April 2008 (EDT)
Yes. :-) I am just so new here... --Vaganyik 10:56, 6 April 2008 (EDT)
