Difference between revisions of "Burden of proof"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (bold)
(rewriting to my taste - please vet for legal accuracy)
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''burden of proof''', in the law of evidence, is the necessity or duty of affirmatively proving a fact or facts in dispute on an issue raised between the parties in a lawsuit. The responsibility of proving a point (the burden of proof). It deals with which side must establish a point or points. (See [[standard of proof]].) [[category:legal terms]]
+
The '''burden of proof''' is the responsibility of proving a point which is at issue between contending parties, as in a [[lawsuit]]. This is in contrast to a [[debate]], in which each party must support his contentions.
 +
 
 +
In certain types of a dispute the ''[[status quo]]'' is often accepted as the norm, and defenders of the norm need not prove that it is true. Challengers to the norm have the burden of proof.
 +
 
 +
See [[standard of proof]].
 +
 
 +
[[category:legal terms]]

Revision as of 15:05, April 6, 2008

The burden of proof is the responsibility of proving a point which is at issue between contending parties, as in a lawsuit. This is in contrast to a debate, in which each party must support his contentions.

In certain types of a dispute the status quo is often accepted as the norm, and defenders of the norm need not prove that it is true. Challengers to the norm have the burden of proof.

See standard of proof.