Difference between revisions of "Burden of proof"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Schlafly is a Rehab)
m (Reverted edits by W00tbot (Talk); changed back to last version by Ed Poor)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- The '''burden of proof''' is the responsibility of proving a point which is at issue between contending parties, as in a [[lawsuit]]. This is in contrast to a [[debate]], in which each party must support his contentions.  
+
The '''burden of proof''' is the responsibility of proving a point which is at issue between contending parties, as in a [[lawsuit]]. This is in contrast to a [[debate]], in which each party must support his contentions.  
  
 
In certain types of a dispute the ''[[status quo]]'' is often accepted as the norm, and defenders of the norm need not prove that it is true. Challengers to the norm have the burden of proof.
 
In certain types of a dispute the ''[[status quo]]'' is often accepted as the norm, and defenders of the norm need not prove that it is true. Challengers to the norm have the burden of proof.
Line 5: Line 5:
 
See [[standard of proof]].
 
See [[standard of proof]].
  
[[category:legal terms]] -->
+
[[category:legal terms]]

Revision as of 18:23, April 15, 2008

The burden of proof is the responsibility of proving a point which is at issue between contending parties, as in a lawsuit. This is in contrast to a debate, in which each party must support his contentions.

In certain types of a dispute the status quo is often accepted as the norm, and defenders of the norm need not prove that it is true. Challengers to the norm have the burden of proof.

See standard of proof.