Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wheel"
From Conservapedia
(mention of ezekiel) |
m (Why does this article even bother to exist?) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Uhhh. I like wheels too. :) Should this article have a mention of [[Ezekiel]] in it? [[User:Vossy|Vossy]] 01:03, 16 March 2007 (EDT) | :Uhhh. I like wheels too. :) Should this article have a mention of [[Ezekiel]] in it? [[User:Vossy|Vossy]] 01:03, 16 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | This "article" (for lack of a better word) is absurd: it provides close to zero information on what is one of the most fundamentally earth-changing machines ever invented by humanity. Two incepid and plagerized paragraphs for the greatest invention ever, second only to fire itself! | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is this what "conservative" has come to? Does "conservative" now mean "wallowing in ignorance, incompetence, and stupidity?" What ever posessed some people to actually believe an article about The Wheel could in any way be politicized into "conservative" (i.e., pseudo-conservative fascism) and "non-conservative?" | ||
Revision as of 15:30, March 17, 2007
Wheel good. Fire Bad. I am a conservative scientist and believe this is true because the wheel is good and fire is bad.
- Uhhh. I like wheels too. :) Should this article have a mention of Ezekiel in it? Vossy 01:03, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
This "article" (for lack of a better word) is absurd: it provides close to zero information on what is one of the most fundamentally earth-changing machines ever invented by humanity. Two incepid and plagerized paragraphs for the greatest invention ever, second only to fire itself!
Is this what "conservative" has come to? Does "conservative" now mean "wallowing in ignorance, incompetence, and stupidity?" What ever posessed some people to actually believe an article about The Wheel could in any way be politicized into "conservative" (i.e., pseudo-conservative fascism) and "non-conservative?"
