Changes

[[Image:Flagellum_3_ideacenter.jpg|thumb|300px|right|Bacterial Flagellum]]

[[Image:Flagellum_3_ideacenter.jpg|thumb|300px|right|Bacterial Flagellum]]

Another example is the bacterial [[flagellum|'''flagellum''']].  As quoted at '''Access Research Network''',<ref>http://www.arn.org/docs/mm/flagellum_all.htm</ref> Behe explains: "Because the bacterial flagellum is necessarily composed of at least three parts -- a paddle,a rotor, and a motor -- it is irreducibly complex. Gradual evolution of the flagellum, like the cilium, therefore faces mammoth hurdles." The bacterial flagellum is just one of virually innumerable biological structures, that, once understood in detail, have no naturalistic causal explanation.  Many evolutionists have attempted to deny Behe's contention that the flagellum is irreducibly complex, but every attempt fails to show how the flagellum actually could have been formed by Darwinian gradualism. Rather, all denials by evolutionists of irreducible complexity rely on non-confirmable, non-falsifiable, non-experimental assumptions to justify belief in unguided processes to produce such structures.

Another example is the bacterial [[flagellum|'''flagellum''']].  As quoted at '''Access Research Network''',<ref>http://www.arn.org/docs/mm/flagellum_all.htm</ref> Behe explains: "Because the bacterial flagellum is necessarily composed of at least three parts -- a paddle,a rotor, and a motor -- it is irreducibly complex. Gradual evolution of the flagellum, like the cilium, therefore faces mammoth hurdles." The bacterial flagellum is just one of virtually innumerable biological structures, that, once understood in detail, have no naturalistic causal explanation.  Many evolutionists have attempted to deny Behe's contention that the flagellum is irreducibly complex, but every attempt fails to show how the flagellum actually could have been formed by Darwinian gradualism. Rather, all denials by evolutionists of irreducible complexity rely on non-confirmable, non-falsifiable, non-experimental assumptions to justify belief in unguided processes to produce such structures.

For more on irreducible complexity, go here<ref>http://www.discovery.org/a/1831</ref>, or here<ref>http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/1142</ref>, or here<ref>http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/irreducible_complexity_01.html</ref>.

For more on irreducible complexity, go here<ref>http://www.discovery.org/a/1831</ref>, or here<ref>http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/1142</ref>, or here<ref>http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/irreducible_complexity_01.html</ref>.