Difference between revisions of "Attachment"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (bold)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
An '''attachment''' is taking a person's property to satisfy a court-ordered [[debt]]. [[category:legal terms]]
+
An '''attachment''' is taking a person's property to satisfy a court-ordered [[debt]]. [[Category:Legal Terms]]
  
 
When assets are in controversy at in a [[civil lawsuit]], a [[plaintiff]] may request a ''writ of attachment'', asking the Court to either (1) seize or (2) take note of certain assets, to be exchanged at the successful conclusion of a lawsuit.
 
When assets are in controversy at in a [[civil lawsuit]], a [[plaintiff]] may request a ''writ of attachment'', asking the Court to either (1) seize or (2) take note of certain assets, to be exchanged at the successful conclusion of a lawsuit.
Line 5: Line 5:
 
Sometimes attachment impounds attached assets.  Attachment of certain assets or properties may require a hearing prior to attachment.  For example, a court will rarely attach & immobilize wages without a prior hearing.  Anything less is a deprivation of [[due process]] of law.
 
Sometimes attachment impounds attached assets.  Attachment of certain assets or properties may require a hearing prior to attachment.  For example, a court will rarely attach & immobilize wages without a prior hearing.  Anything less is a deprivation of [[due process]] of law.
  
[[Category:Legal terms]]
+
[[Category:Legal Terms]]

Latest revision as of 18:21, April 23, 2008

An attachment is taking a person's property to satisfy a court-ordered debt.

When assets are in controversy at in a civil lawsuit, a plaintiff may request a writ of attachment, asking the Court to either (1) seize or (2) take note of certain assets, to be exchanged at the successful conclusion of a lawsuit.

Sometimes attachment impounds attached assets. Attachment of certain assets or properties may require a hearing prior to attachment. For example, a court will rarely attach & immobilize wages without a prior hearing. Anything less is a deprivation of due process of law.