Difference between revisions of "Point"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Perfect circles, three-sided squares . . .)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{stub}}A Point was described by [[Euclid]] as "that which has no part".  A point has no parts, but location only.  A point can be represented on paper by a dot; however the dot is not a point, but only represents it. Because the actual dot contains millions of molecules of ink and other substances, whereas the point exists as an abstraction only.  
+
{{stub}}A '''point''' was described by [[Euclid]] as "that which has no part".  A point has no parts, but location only.  A point can be represented on paper by a dot; however the dot is not a point, but only represents it. Because the actual dot contains millions of molecules of ink and other substances, whereas the point exists as an abstraction only.  
  
 
[[Category:Geometry]]
 
[[Category:Geometry]]

Revision as of 21:47, May 1, 2008

Template:StubA point was described by Euclid as "that which has no part". A point has no parts, but location only. A point can be represented on paper by a dot; however the dot is not a point, but only represents it. Because the actual dot contains millions of molecules of ink and other substances, whereas the point exists as an abstraction only.