Difference between revisions of "Origins debate"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(made the article fit the source better)
Line 12: Line 12:
 
There is considerable debate over whether there is any viable middle ground between the materialist views and the [[Creationism|Creationist]] views. Some would hold, though, that a viable middle position could be found if both sides recognized how miraculous any theory of creation is, whether it is perfect conditions for development or a Prime Mover such as God.
 
There is considerable debate over whether there is any viable middle ground between the materialist views and the [[Creationism|Creationist]] views. Some would hold, though, that a viable middle position could be found if both sides recognized how miraculous any theory of creation is, whether it is perfect conditions for development or a Prime Mover such as God.
  
Gallup polls show that one third of Americans believe that human beings "evolved" in a process guided by God. <ref> This statement is one of three presented in a survey: "Human beings have developed over millions of years from less advanced forms of life, but God guided this process" Thirty-seven percent agreed with it. [http://www.unl.edu/rhames/courses/current/creation/evol-poll.htm] </ref>
+
A Gallup poll shows that 37% of Americans believe that human beings "evolved" in a process guided by God, 45% believe God created human beings in roughly their present form, and 12% believe a process of natural selection over millions of years developed humans completely independent of God. <ref> This statement is one of three presented in a survey: "Human beings have developed over millions of years from less advanced forms of life, but God guided this process" Thirty-seven percent agreed with it. [http://www.unl.edu/rhames/courses/current/creation/evol-poll.htm] </ref>
  
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==

Revision as of 00:50, May 4, 2008

The origins debate is the age-old conflict of ideas about how human beings appeared on the Earth, how the various kinds of animals and plants came into being, and how the Earth itself came into being.

Major views

Most people throughout history have ascribed origins to a First Cause - God or various gods. Materialist views, i.e. that our creation happened due to natural circumstances, have also been put forth in this debate, some as early as ancient Greece.

Judaism and Christianity posit that "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth." (Genesis 1:1) Then He created plants (Genesis 1:11-13), animals (Genesis 1:20-23), and finally people (Genesis 1:26-27). Other major religions have similar creation stories.

Materialistic views are many and various. The prevailing views in modern science (i.e., astronomy, geology and biology) employ the Big Bang theory to explain cosmic origins and the Theory of Evolution to explain the emergence of plants, animals and people.

There is considerable debate over whether there is any viable middle ground between the materialist views and the Creationist views. Some would hold, though, that a viable middle position could be found if both sides recognized how miraculous any theory of creation is, whether it is perfect conditions for development or a Prime Mover such as God.

A Gallup poll shows that 37% of Americans believe that human beings "evolved" in a process guided by God, 45% believe God created human beings in roughly their present form, and 12% believe a process of natural selection over millions of years developed humans completely independent of God. [1]

Notes

  1. This statement is one of three presented in a survey: "Human beings have developed over millions of years from less advanced forms of life, but God guided this process" Thirty-seven percent agreed with it. [1]