Difference between revisions of "User talk:TimF"
From Conservapedia
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Wait, so it isn't true that Steinbeck was a liberal atheist? -TimF | :Wait, so it isn't true that Steinbeck was a liberal atheist? -TimF | ||
::I'm not saying it isn't true; what I'm saying is that you have to have a solid, reliable source to back up what you said, otherwise what you said can be called a case of libel. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 07:19, 15 May 2008 (EDT) | ::I'm not saying it isn't true; what I'm saying is that you have to have a solid, reliable source to back up what you said, otherwise what you said can be called a case of libel. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 07:19, 15 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
| − | :::I see, thanks for the clarification. Will hunt for proof! | + | :::I see, thanks for the clarification. Will hunt for proof! I'm new to this whole thing! -TimF |
Latest revision as of 11:22, May 15, 2008
Let's not make up the flaws of celebrities without a proper source to back the allegations up. Karajou 07:02, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
- Wait, so it isn't true that Steinbeck was a liberal atheist? -TimF
- I'm not saying it isn't true; what I'm saying is that you have to have a solid, reliable source to back up what you said, otherwise what you said can be called a case of libel. Karajou 07:19, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
- I see, thanks for the clarification. Will hunt for proof! I'm new to this whole thing! -TimF
- I'm not saying it isn't true; what I'm saying is that you have to have a solid, reliable source to back up what you said, otherwise what you said can be called a case of libel. Karajou 07:19, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
