Difference between revisions of "Superficial"

Revision as of 21:58, May 15, 2008

F**K CONSERVAPEDIA!!! WIKIPEDIA IS FAR BETTER!!! THEY AT LEAST KNOW HOW TO CREATE GOOD ARTICLES UNLIKE YOU RIGHT WINGED BASTARDS!

Revision as of 21:36, May 15, 2008 (view source) LChriosa (talk \| contribs) (New page: '''Superficial''' Can be used for people and objects. A superficial man has only skimmed the surface of knowledge and has not learned anything thoroughly. A superficial work has the same ...)		Revision as of 21:58, May 15, 2008 (view source) Eateallofus (talk \| contribs) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~'''Superficial'''~~	+	F**K CONSERVAPEDIA!!! WIKIPEDIA IS FAR BETTER!!! THEY AT LEAST KNOW HOW TO CREATE GOOD ARTICLES UNLIKE YOU RIGHT WINGED BASTARDS!
−
−	Can be used for people and objects. A superficial man has only skimmed the surface of knowledge and has not learned anything thoroughly. A superficial work has the same fault as a superficial man. The more superficial men there are in a country, the more profound men there will be as well, everything else being equal, for there is only one way to stand out above others, that is, by being more learned.