1
edit
Changes
→Foreign policy
You cant say he has ''no'' foreign policy experience and then have a section on foreign policy experience. So you have three choices here. Either revert my edit and keep the the foreign policy section (which is at odds with the article), delete the section (which means you have removed factual info to support an unfactual claim) or leave as is (which is correct according to the facts presented).
You cant say he has ''no'' foreign policy experience and then have a section on foreign policy experience. So you have three choices here. Either revert my edit and keep the the foreign policy section (which is at odds with the article), delete the section (which means you have removed factual info to support an unfactual claim) or leave as is (which is correct according to the facts presented).
[[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 07:18, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
[[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 07:18, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
==introductory paragraphs==
The first few paragraphs after the 1st paragraphs need a lot of work. Maybe integrate the ideas later into the article. The way it is now makes conservapedia look biased. It looks like an attack piece. One can integrate the same facts into a better written article.[[User:BTV|BTV]] 01:55, 17 May 2008 (EDT)