Difference between revisions of "Talk:Time magazine"
From Conservapedia
Greenmeanie (Talk | contribs) m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
dont say that it has a liberal bias, just because a conservative website said that they did (lots of websites that would be called liberal say fox news is biased, while its wiki says that it is "unbiased")-[[User:Greenmeanie|Greenmeanie]] 19:29, 29 May 2008 (EDT) | dont say that it has a liberal bias, just because a conservative website said that they did (lots of websites that would be called liberal say fox news is biased, while its wiki says that it is "unbiased")-[[User:Greenmeanie|Greenmeanie]] 19:29, 29 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
:im sorry apparently, saying that constituded a 3 day block -_-, because apperantly i didn't have the authorization to issue a command (although i could just be told instead of being blocked) and i suppose i should have said: i don't think that its right to say that it has a liberal bias, just because a conservative website said that they did (lots of websites that would be called liberal say fox news is biased, while its wiki says that it is "unbiased") (and if this is bad just post a response, instead of blocking me again)-[[User:Greenmeanie|Greenmeanie]] 21:00, 1 June 2008 (EDT) | :im sorry apparently, saying that constituded a 3 day block -_-, because apperantly i didn't have the authorization to issue a command (although i could just be told instead of being blocked) and i suppose i should have said: i don't think that its right to say that it has a liberal bias, just because a conservative website said that they did (lots of websites that would be called liberal say fox news is biased, while its wiki says that it is "unbiased") (and if this is bad just post a response, instead of blocking me again)-[[User:Greenmeanie|Greenmeanie]] 21:00, 1 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Greenmeanie, this magazine does have a liberal bias, and if needs be we will add in more references to that effect. If you disagree, talk to any of the sysops or ASchlafly. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 02:03, 2 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 06:03, June 2, 2008
dont say that it has a liberal bias, just because a conservative website said that they did (lots of websites that would be called liberal say fox news is biased, while its wiki says that it is "unbiased")-Greenmeanie 19:29, 29 May 2008 (EDT)
- im sorry apparently, saying that constituded a 3 day block -_-, because apperantly i didn't have the authorization to issue a command (although i could just be told instead of being blocked) and i suppose i should have said: i don't think that its right to say that it has a liberal bias, just because a conservative website said that they did (lots of websites that would be called liberal say fox news is biased, while its wiki says that it is "unbiased") (and if this is bad just post a response, instead of blocking me again)-Greenmeanie 21:00, 1 June 2008 (EDT)
- Greenmeanie, this magazine does have a liberal bias, and if needs be we will add in more references to that effect. If you disagree, talk to any of the sysops or ASchlafly. Karajou 02:03, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
