21
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 10:
Line 10: + + + + + + + + +
no edit summary
:Isn't it more of a "scoff" than a "sigh"? +_+ [[User:Kektklik|Kektk]] 09:00, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
:Isn't it more of a "scoff" than a "sigh"? +_+ [[User:Kektklik|Kektk]] 09:00, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
Andy, you're clueless. I'm sure to the 95% degree that you are against [insert unrelated conservative talking point here]. This proves that your worldview is skewered! You are clearly using "Conservative Style" rule number 36 which is [insert ad hominem attack in a lazy attampt to discredit opponent without actually adressing his points]. You see, Andy, words are tools invented by humans. They are used to express ideas and thoughts, and have no intrinsic value in and of themselves.
There are no such thing as ugly words, only ugly thoughts and ideas. Example: See if you can name the truly offensive sentence of the 2 below.
1. You're f-ing great, man. I love you so f-ing much.
2. Sir, I detest you, and wish for you to writhe in agony for all eternity.
Did you get it? Yes that's right. Sentence 2 is the only one that we should morally object to. To arbitrarily pick combinations of letters and sounds and label them 'offensive' is childish and a waste of time. All the same, good luck and Godspeed, Andy![[User:StephenS|StephenS]] ps, i know the first sentence sounds dumb to you, but that's besides the point. If that's how close friends wish to communicate, what business is it of yours?
==Revert==
==Revert==