343
edits
Changes
→Significant changes to the article: response to Tmtoulouse
::The reason it was a common target is because there are very few edits really on this site, so when an edit occurs those of us that patrol the recent changes all collapse on it. No conspiracy or anything, just a function of the current conditions of this site. What information in the current article specifically do you want to see changed? Lets start there. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 19:19, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
::The reason it was a common target is because there are very few edits really on this site, so when an edit occurs those of us that patrol the recent changes all collapse on it. No conspiracy or anything, just a function of the current conditions of this site. What information in the current article specifically do you want to see changed? Lets start there. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 19:19, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
::: Thank you for the reply. Rather that say a particular information, could we instead address the issue of attribution? Because, if we address attribution the question of "what information" becomes moot, becomes nil and unimportant. The two attributions to xenu.net present information. Rather than say, "hey, what sense does that make", I stated that xenu.net is a personal website, a personal opinion by of one person. Rather than say "let's talk about this information", can we instead get good, substatial attributions ? The reason I say this is because if we do then we will have good information. And if we don't, we'll have personal opinion (one person on a planet of 6.5 billion). I believe what will happen is the "bad" information will be gone if personal websites are not used to support "bad" information. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 22:08, 18 March 2007 (EDT)