Changes

432 bytes added ,  03:06, March 19, 2007
→‎Significant changes to the article: More about personal websites
Line 36: Line 36:  
::::Okay, no more xenu.net so all is copasetic? [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 22:30, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
 
::::Okay, no more xenu.net so all is copasetic? [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 22:30, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
 
::::: If information is attributed and referenced, and if those attributions do not point to personal websites, then why would I object?  My intention is toward presenting good information in those areas that I know about.  By "good", I mean information that a person can have confidence in.  [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 23:01, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
 
::::: If information is attributed and referenced, and if those attributions do not point to personal websites, then why would I object?  My intention is toward presenting good information in those areas that I know about.  By "good", I mean information that a person can have confidence in.  [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 23:01, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
K. Spaink, too, [http://www.xs4all.nl/~kspaink/fishman/ot3.html] is a personal website.  The thing is, an individual person has no responsibility for good information.  They might post, "the moon is made of green cheese".  In that link Spaink explains her point of view and combines it with other opinion and what do we have?  Good information, or very biased personal opinion ? [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 23:06, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
343

edits