1,106
edits
Changes
no edit summary
:Quotes directly from primary sources and other secondary sources. Seems perfectly reliable to me. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 23:16, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
:Quotes directly from primary sources and other secondary sources. Seems perfectly reliable to me. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 23:16, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
:: I removed the link to that personal website and the information it referenced to. One personal website link might be of slightly better quality than another personal website link, One posting on a light pole slightly better than a second posting on a light pole. But neither are much good. Why do you argue for conservapedia and present yourself in one way on Wikipedia, but add in "evil" here on your userpage, and take issue with personal websites here, Tmtoulouse? [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 01:17, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
:: I removed the link to that personal website and the information it referenced to. One personal website link might be of slightly better quality than another personal website link, One posting on a light pole slightly better than a second posting on a light pole. But neither are much good. Why do you argue for conservapedia and present yourself in one way on Wikipedia, but add in "evil" here on your userpage, and take issue with personal websites here, Tmtoulouse? [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 01:17, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
:::None of the issues related to me matter at all. I see nothing wrong with the source, as things stand its an acceptable source for conservapedia. Your welcome to ask for admin comment on this. Until then the sourced claim should stay. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 01:23, 19 March 2007 (EDT)