Difference between revisions of "Diagonalization"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (link)
(Fixed this load of absolute rubbish.)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''Diagonalization''' is a technique first used by [[Cantor|George Cantor]], a [[Germany|German]] [[Mathematician|mathematician]]. He used it to show that the [[Cardinality|cardinality]] of the [[Real_number|real numbers]] is not equal to the cardinality of the [[Natural_number|natural numbers]], thereby demonstrating one [[Infinity|infinity]] is bigger than the other infinity.  
+
'''Diagonalization''' is a technique first used by [[Cantor|George Cantor]], a [[Germany|German]] [[Mathematician|mathematician]]. He used it to show that the [[Cardinality|cardinality]] of the [[Real_number|real numbers]] is not equal to the cardinality of the [[Natural_number|natural numbers]], thereby demonstrating the real numbers are not countable.  
  
−
This method can be applied to any infinite set to construct an even larger infinite set. The method uses the [[Axiom_of_Choice|Axiom of Choice]].  
+
==Proof of the non-countability of real numbers==
 +
There exists a map <math>f:[0,1]\rightarrow\mathbb{R}</math> (in fact all infintitly supported probability distribution does this). Therefor there are as many number in <math>[0,1]</math> as <math>\mathbb{R}</math>.
  
−
===Diagonalization and the Existence of God===
+
We will now use [[proof by contradiction]] to show that the numbers in <math>[0,1]</math> are uncountable.
  
−
Some have cited diagonalization as a formal challenge to [[Saint_Anselm|Saint Anselm]]'s argument for the existence of God. In summary, Anselm argued that there must be a greatest idea and what could be greater than God? Therefore God exists.<ref>http://www.ephilosopher.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?104130</ref>
+
Assume that that they are countable then we can list them as such,
  
−
However, diagonalization argues that no greatest idea can exist: quite bluntly, God is infinite, therefore He can be diagonalized to produce an even greater infinite.<ref>''Topo-philosophies: Plato's Diagonals, Hegel's Spirals, and Irigaray's Multifolds'', Arkady Plotnitsky. In ''After Poststructuralism: Writing the Intellectual History of Theory'' Tilottama Rajan, Michael James.</ref> This seeming [[disproof]] of the existence of God has cast doubt on the validity of Cantor's diagonalization. In particular, it provides yet another counterintuitive conclusion from the dubious [[Axiom_of_Choice|Axiom of Choice]].
+
<math>
 +
0.a_{11}a_{12}a_{13}a_{14}a_{15}\dots
 +
</math>
 +
 
 +
<math>
 +
0.a_{21}a_{22}a_{23}a_{24}a_{25}\dots
 +
</math>
 +
 
 +
<math>
 +
0.a_{31}a_{32}a_{33}a_{34}a_{35}\dots
 +
</math>
 +
 
 +
<math>
 +
0.a_{41}a_{42}a_{43}a_{44}a_{45}\dots
 +
</math>
 +
 
 +
<math>
 +
\vdots
 +
</math>
 +
 
 +
Where <math>a_{ij}\in\{0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9\}</math>
 +
 
 +
Construct the number,
 +
 
 +
<math>a=0.a_{1}a_{2}a_{3}a_{4}\dots</math>, where
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<math>a_{i}=1</math> when <math>a_{ii}\neq1</math> and <math>a_{i}=2</math> when <math>a_{ii}=1</math>.
 +
 
 +
Therefor <math>a</math> is not in the list and so we have a contradition so our assumption is false hand the number <math>[0,1]</math> are not countable. Therefor <math>\mathbb{R}</math> is uncountable.
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
  
−
<references/>
+
Komolgorov, ''Introduction to Real Analysis''. (You can find it inalmost any book store).
  
−
[[Category:Mathematics]][[Category:Philosophy]]
+
[[Category:Mathematics]]

Revision as of 23:51, June 14, 2008

Diagonalization is a technique first used by George Cantor, a German mathematician. He used it to show that the cardinality of the real numbers is not equal to the cardinality of the natural numbers, thereby demonstrating the real numbers are not countable.

Proof of the non-countability of real numbers

There exists a map (in fact all infintitly supported probability distribution does this). Therefor there are as many number in as .

We will now use proof by contradiction to show that the numbers in are uncountable.

Assume that that they are countable then we can list them as such,

Where

Construct the number,

, where


when and when .

Therefor is not in the list and so we have a contradition so our assumption is false hand the number are not countable. Therefor is uncountable.

References

Komolgorov, Introduction to Real Analysis. (You can find it inalmost any book store).