Difference between revisions of "Talk:Firefighting"
From Conservapedia
(Move (rename) proposal) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Move (rename) proposal == | == Move (rename) proposal == | ||
I wouldn't really know which is correct, but "firefighting" returns about 5.8 million Google hits, whereas "fire fighting" returns about 7.8 million Google hits. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:04, 7 March 2008 (EST) | I wouldn't really know which is correct, but "firefighting" returns about 5.8 million Google hits, whereas "fire fighting" returns about 7.8 million Google hits. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:04, 7 March 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | What was wrong with moving it? Google hits are good for general observations, but in this case "firefighting" is definitely the more correct term. [[User:Fantasia|Fantasia]] 19:40, 26 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 23:40, June 26, 2008
Move (rename) proposal
I wouldn't really know which is correct, but "firefighting" returns about 5.8 million Google hits, whereas "fire fighting" returns about 7.8 million Google hits. Philip J. Rayment 08:04, 7 March 2008 (EST)
What was wrong with moving it? Google hits are good for general observations, but in this case "firefighting" is definitely the more correct term. Fantasia 19:40, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
