Changes

379 bytes added ,  21:09, March 19, 2007
no edit summary
Line 102: Line 102:  
::At this point I just want the definition we are using to be properly attributed. Thats all. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 16:59, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 
::At this point I just want the definition we are using to be properly attributed. Thats all. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 16:59, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 
::: Okay, here is the link we have been using: [http://info.scientology.org/] and its first sentences begins, "Scientology is an applied religious philosophy".  Which is what the article says, word for word.  What would you like changed ? [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 17:05, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 
::: Okay, here is the link we have been using: [http://info.scientology.org/] and its first sentences begins, "Scientology is an applied religious philosophy".  Which is what the article says, word for word.  What would you like changed ? [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 17:05, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
:::: Nothing, use the definition but attribute it in the text to the Church, since that is who owns and runs that site. Just as I have been advocating from the start. However, here is another option I might be okay with, use your wording, but add a sentence afterwards giving other definitions and sourcing them as well. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 17:09, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
1,106

edits