1,161
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 32:
Line 32: + + + +
Gravitationism, Electricityism, Wheelism
If this stays then [[Quote mining]] ought to stay too. --[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 18:54, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
If this stays then [[Quote mining]] ought to stay too. --[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 18:54, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
== Gravitationism, Electricityism, Wheelism ==
[[User:Horace|Horace]], you wanted a response. Okay, let's think about this facetious comment/[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Evolutionism%2FDraft&diff=49324&oldid=49305 edit] in a logical way. What can you really say about those things? Can you say that certain forms of them are based in [[Naturalism]], or [[Atheism]], or [[Materialism]]? How many people hold to those? On the other hand, there is obviously disagreement over Evolutionism on this wiki, but multiple sources I've referenced do not agree with you guys. Even if you don't like the term Evolutionism, still the idea of Evolution carries much more weight then those things you mentioned. Therefore, I've removed that useless edit. Please try to be more constructive. Please take note that I would love counter arguments to be placed here. In fact I've added a link from TalkOrigins. This article is very much balanced. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 19:27, 19 March 2007 (EDT)