| Line 263: |
Line 263: |
| | | | |
| | :::::A few other things I'd like to note: | | :::::A few other things I'd like to note: |
| − | :::::Naturalism: You argue that naturalistic explanations are atheistic. Yet, you yourself probably use them. If you lose your keys do you look for a naturalistic explanation or do you think a mischievous demon has stolen them? Naturalistic explanations are used by scientists because they actually teach us something about the world. No one is angry at meteorologists for using naturalism to study the weather, instead of just saying Zeus does it. Without ''somebody'' first proposing to use [[methodological naturalism]] to investigate the world, we'd still believe that thunder was caused by Thor slamming his hammer, or that earthquakes were caused by Poseidon hitting the ground with his trident. | + | :::::Naturalism: You argue that naturalistic explanations are atheistic. Yet, you yourself probably use them. If you lose your keys do you look for a naturalistic explanation or do you think a mischievous demon has stolen them? Naturalistic explanations are used by scientists because they actually teach us something about the world. No one is angry at meteorologists for using naturalism to study the weather, instead of just saying Zeus does it. Without ''somebody'' first proposing to use [[methodological naturalism]] to investigate the world, we'd still believe that thunder was caused by Thor slamming his hammer, or that earthquakes were caused by Poseidon hitting the ground with his trident. It's just a more useful way to look at the world. |
| − | :::::''"With atheism, nothing has any meaning."'' While this is true in the sense that nothing has any supernatural meaning, therein lies the intellectual maturity of nonbelief. You have to find your ''own'' meaning in life, and it's going to be different for everyone. I love writing and that is my meaning but it may not be yours. It is communistic to say that there is '''one''' meaning for everyone. | + | :::::''"With atheism, nothing has any meaning."'' While this is true in the sense that nothing has any supernatural meaning, therein lies the intellectual maturity of nonbelief. You have to find your ''own'' meaning in life, and it's going to be different for everyone. I love writing and that is my meaning but it may not be yours. It is communistic to prescribe one singular meaning for everyone. |
| − | ''"Why trust what you think, when your thoughts are the result of chance?"'' Good point. It's generally wrong to trust what humans believe unless it's been verified by the scientific method and individual prejudices have been filtered out by peer review. But the same argument goes both ways; why trust what you think if you believe that everyone has inherited an implicit sinfulness from the first man? | + | :::::''"Why trust what you think, when your thoughts are the result of chance?"'' Good point. It's generally wrong to trust what humans believe unless it's been verified by the scientific method and individual prejudices have been filtered out by peer review. But the same argument goes both ways; why trust what you think if you believe that everyone has inherited an implicit sinfulness from the first man? |
| − | --[[User:Stirlatez|Stirlatez]] 20:40, 25 August 2008 (EDT) | + | :::::--[[User:Stirlatez|Stirlatez]] 20:40, 25 August 2008 (EDT) |