Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mercy"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Plagiarism plain and simple)
 
(Still plagiarism pure and simple (with tweak of original entry))
Line 1: Line 1:
As sweet and touching as this article is (currently), is this really an encyclopedic article? Am I able to take any adjective and Conservapedia article by citing scripture or poetry exclusively? And UNATTRIBUTED poetry at that? I'm sorry, but this was placed here with absolutely NO attribution to William Shakespeare. I'm getting disgusted with the poor quality of contributions here. Conservapedia? How about "Plagiarize-apedia." See [[plagiarism]]. Get with the program people. --[[User:AdmiralNelson|AdmiralNelson]] 12:02, 27 August 2008 (EDT)
+
As sweet and touching as this article is (currently), is this really an encyclopedic article? Am I able to take any adjective and create a Conservapedia article by citing scripture or poetry exclusively? And UNATTRIBUTED poetry at that? I'm sorry, but this was placed here with absolutely NO attribution to William Shakespeare. I'm getting disgusted with the poor quality of contributions here. Conservapedia? How about "Plagiarize-apedia." See [[plagiarism]]. Get with the program people. --[[User:AdmiralNelson|AdmiralNelson]] 12:02, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:05, August 27, 2008

As sweet and touching as this article is (currently), is this really an encyclopedic article? Am I able to take any adjective and create a Conservapedia article by citing scripture or poetry exclusively? And UNATTRIBUTED poetry at that? I'm sorry, but this was placed here with absolutely NO attribution to William Shakespeare. I'm getting disgusted with the poor quality of contributions here. Conservapedia? How about "Plagiarize-apedia." See plagiarism. Get with the program people. --AdmiralNelson 12:02, 27 August 2008 (EDT)