Difference between revisions of "User talk:HenryS"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Request: new section)
Line 50: Line 50:
 
I noticed your revert of my user talk page. Thank you, Henry. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:36, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
 
I noticed your revert of my user talk page. Thank you, Henry. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:36, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
 
:Sure, I didn't think you would want ''that'' there. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 22:43, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
 
:Sure, I didn't think you would want ''that'' there. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 22:43, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Request ==
 +
 +
Could you please protect the [[Multiplication]] page? I fear it might become the target of Liberal vandals, and it is quite good as it is now, don't you agree? Sure, discuss the protection with the Mathematics sub-project leader, Ed Poor. --[[User:EPauper|EPauper]] 12:06, 3 September 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:06, September 3, 2008

Complain below, please

Likely vandal

Hi Henry. User:NNSTK17 seems to be a vandal. Please look at his edit history. -Foxtrot 18:53, 14 July 2008 (EDT)

Thanks. Blocked. HenryS 19:08, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
Thanks :) -Foxtrot 19:14, 14 July 2008 (EDT)

Unblock reason

LOL @ 18:44, 16 July 2008 HenryS (Talk | contribs | block) unblocked AKjeldsen (Talk | contribs) ‎ (User is begging and whining to be unblocked. ) --Ed Poor Talk 21:18, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

Hippocratic Oath

Henry, Why did you revert my edit to Oath of Hippocrates?

  1. The entire section is about people who are critical of the oath. It makes sense to call the section "Criticism" instead of the watered down "Views".
  2. "Some Christian doctors may not like this oath" — That's just deliberately weak liberal claptrap. Do you really believe that a devout Christian can "solemnly swear to Apollo and Asclepius" — pagan Roman Gods?! What happened to "Thou shalt have no other Gods before Me?" My edit just removed the liberal, cultural-relativist POV from that sentence. Look at the history, where Deborah has been watering it down and watering it down ever since the article was created.
  3. Other than that, I just made some links to other articles — which you also reverted.

Can I have your permission to edit the article again for these reasons? GeorgeM 11:45, 22 July 2008 (EDT)

Okay. HenryS 18:34, 22 July 2008 (EDT)

Danish Writers Group

Hi, what's that group? Can I take part in it? I'm not a Dane, but I'm a Honorary Dane. Cacatio 18:33, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

The DWG writes Danish content for the encyclopedia. It is a sort of "wikiproject" but more sophisticated. Yes, please do take part, all the other members are lazy and I am too busy being important to be bothered to write content. HenryS 18:36, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

Please unlock my page

From recent edits I see your up and about, could you please unlock my user page? Thanx

DLerner 20:14, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

תודה רבה

DLerner 20:17, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

Ames

He's way too smart for this mundane ...

Then why, why was he asking me to unblock him? HenryS 21:31, 30 August 2008 (EDT)

The Quiet One

Henry, you've managed to keep such a low profile that I actually had to look you up to see whether you were an admin. ;-) We need to get together more. --Ed Poor Talk 21:35, 30 August 2008 (EDT)

Why do you keep getting all the awards? Seriously, the judging must be flawed. HenryS 21:44, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
ROTFL! You don't want this kind of award. :P --Ed Poor Talk 21:54, 30 August 2008 (EDT)

I noticed your revert of my user talk page. Thank you, Henry. --Ed Poor Talk 22:36, 1 September 2008 (EDT)

Sure, I didn't think you would want that there. HenryS 22:43, 1 September 2008 (EDT)

Request

Could you please protect the Multiplication page? I fear it might become the target of Liberal vandals, and it is quite good as it is now, don't you agree? Sure, discuss the protection with the Mathematics sub-project leader, Ed Poor. --EPauper 12:06, 3 September 2008 (EDT)