Changes

Articles does not have to be large to be good enough. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 08:28, 11 September 2008 (EDT)

Articles does not have to be large to be good enough. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 08:28, 11 September 2008 (EDT)

: I agree.  However, it depends on the article.  A one-paragraph article on Palin's home town might be appropriate (that's why I wasn't concerned with the length of [[Sausage]]).  A one-paragraph article on the United States would not be.  It's not the size itself that matters, but whether it does the subject justice.  "Too short" is a euphemism for "not covering the topic adequately".  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:57, 11 September 2008 (EDT)

: I agree.  However, it depends on the article.  A one-paragraph article on Palin's home town might be appropriate (that's why I wasn't concerned with the length of [[Sausage]]).  A one-paragraph article on the United States would not be.  It's not the size itself that matters, but whether it does the subject justice.  "Too short" is a euphemism for "not covering the topic adequately".  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:57, 11 September 2008 (EDT)