Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1 byte added ,  15:49, September 16, 2008
Line 10: Line 10:  
{{cquote|The Bush Doctrine, as I understand it, is that we have the right of anticipatory self-defense.  We have the right to a preemptive strike against any country that we think is going to attack us.}}
 
{{cquote|The Bush Doctrine, as I understand it, is that we have the right of anticipatory self-defense.  We have the right to a preemptive strike against any country that we think is going to attack us.}}
   −
The leftist leaning media portrayed the Palin/Gibson exchange as evidence that Sarah Palin is not competent on national security and foreign policy, neglecting to address Charlie Gibson's confusion of preventive war and [[premptive war]], as well as the unlikelihood that Sarah Palin would be familiar with a term popular at salon.com.
+
The leftist leaning media portrayed the Palin/Gibson exchange as evidence that Sarah Palin is not competent on national security and foreign policy, neglecting to address Charlie Gibson's confusion of preventive war and [[preemptive war]], as well as the unlikelihood that Sarah Palin would be familiar with a term popular at salon.com.
 
==Early mentions of the Bush Doctrine==
 
==Early mentions of the Bush Doctrine==
 
In 2002, Steven R. Weisman asserted in a New York Times op./ed. piece defined the Bush Doctrine as that which holds ''those who harbor terrorists are accountable for terrorism''.<ref>[http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A0DE3DE123CF930A25757C0A9649C8B63 Editorial Observer; President Bush and the Middle East Axis of Ambiguity]</ref>
 
In 2002, Steven R. Weisman asserted in a New York Times op./ed. piece defined the Bush Doctrine as that which holds ''those who harbor terrorists are accountable for terrorism''.<ref>[http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A0DE3DE123CF930A25757C0A9649C8B63 Editorial Observer; President Bush and the Middle East Axis of Ambiguity]</ref>
22

edits

Navigation menu