Difference between revisions of "Talk:Interviewer"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(reply to Liam)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Uh oh, this article redirects to itself.  Maybe it's supposed to link to [[interview]], but that doesn't seem quite right either. [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 15:51, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 
Uh oh, this article redirects to itself.  Maybe it's supposed to link to [[interview]], but that doesn't seem quite right either. [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 15:51, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 
: My mistake, thanks for pointing it out. Interview and interviewer are close enough in meaning that they don't need separate pages. What an interviewer and interviewee are can be mentioned easily in the interview article. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 20:57, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 
: My mistake, thanks for pointing it out. Interview and interviewer are close enough in meaning that they don't need separate pages. What an interviewer and interviewee are can be mentioned easily in the interview article. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 20:57, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 +
::Ok, glad I could help!  [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 23:52, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 03:52, September 23, 2008

Uh oh, this article redirects to itself. Maybe it's supposed to link to interview, but that doesn't seem quite right either. LiamG 15:51, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

My mistake, thanks for pointing it out. Interview and interviewer are close enough in meaning that they don't need separate pages. What an interviewer and interviewee are can be mentioned easily in the interview article. -Foxtrot 20:57, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
Ok, glad I could help! LiamG 23:52, 22 September 2008 (EDT)