Difference between revisions of "Swing state"
From Conservapedia
Darkknight (Talk | contribs) (→2008 Swing States: were not losing co or fl either iowa yes tho) |
m ("we're not losing?" (a) you can't know that and (b) that doesn't make something a non-swing state; someone will win every state, and (c) you are reverting proper formatting) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==2008 Swing States== | ==2008 Swing States== | ||
| − | [[Iowa]] | + | *[[Colorado]] |
| − | [[Michigan]] | + | *[[Florida]] |
| − | [[Minnesota]] | + | *[[Iowa]] |
| − | [[New Hampshire]] | + | *[[Michigan]] |
| − | [[New Mexico]] | + | *[[Minnesota]] |
| − | [[Oregon]] | + | *[[New Hampshire]] |
| − | [[Pennsylvania]] | + | *[[New Mexico]] |
| − | [[Wisconsin]] | + | *[[Ohio]] |
| + | *[[Oregon]] | ||
| + | *[[Pennsylvania]] | ||
| + | *[[Wisconsin]] | ||
| + | *[[Virginia]] | ||
[[Category:United States]] | [[Category:United States]] | ||
Revision as of 00:57, October 25, 2008
Swing states are states in which neither the Republican nor Democratic candidate has a clear majority of the voters' support prior to a Presidential election, and therefore could "swing" the election results in either direction. They are also known as "battleground states" because they are where the majority of the campaigning takes place for both parties.
