Difference between revisions of "User talk:St0dad"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I agree with you. The grammar of many articles, and the use of categories, are poor reflections of high ideals.[[User:Canuck|Canuck]] 08:51, 8 November 2008 (EST) | I agree with you. The grammar of many articles, and the use of categories, are poor reflections of high ideals.[[User:Canuck|Canuck]] 08:51, 8 November 2008 (EST) | ||
:Be sure to have a look at [[Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style]], too [[User:Canuck|Canuck]] 08:59, 8 November 2008 (EST) | :Be sure to have a look at [[Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style]], too [[User:Canuck|Canuck]] 08:59, 8 November 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | ::That's why I'm here as well. Grammar and spelling are despicable. I don't pay so much attention to the ideology, just that it comes across more intelligible. [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|<sup>Hello!</sup>]] 21:30, 12 November 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 02:30, November 13, 2008
I agree with you. The grammar of many articles, and the use of categories, are poor reflections of high ideals.Canuck 08:51, 8 November 2008 (EST)
- Be sure to have a look at Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style, too Canuck 08:59, 8 November 2008 (EST)